Showing posts with label Early life infection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Early life infection. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

CONFLICT OF INTEREST / WITCH HUNT / THE REAL STORY ON WHY THERE WAS A MEASLES OUTBREAK!!!!!!!

Did you know the former head of the CDC Dr. Julie Gerberding was named president of Merck & Co Inc's vaccine division back in 2009????  I don't know about you but this says conflict of interest and should make people think twice. All of it gets more twisted as the story goes on and should make everyone stop and think because none of us have the whole story!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/12/21/us-merck-gerberding-idUSTRE5BK2K520091221

It is a well known fact that MERCK kept a hit list of doctors that spoke out against their product VIOXX. For those who don't already know MERCK is the maker of the MUMPS, MEASLES, and RUBELLA vaccine aka the MMR...

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-created-hit-list-to-destroy-neutralize-or-discredit-dissenting-doctors/
WHERE AM I GOING WITH THIS YOU MIGHT ASK???

Well, it is pretty simple I am saying that a few cases of the MUMPS and MEASLES have deliberately been turned into mass hysteria by folks who all have an agenda to sell a product. Fear is a great seller and if you look around online or at the media it is working pretty well.
There is an eerie similarity between the witch hunt for doctors who spoke out against VIOXX and the doctors who are now speaking out against vaccines. Doctor Sherri Tenpenny had to cancel her Australian tour because the media helped whip up a frenzy and there were very real concerns for her safety.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/health/us-antivaccination-campaigner-dr-sherri-tenpenny-cancels-tour-of-australia-20150128-130qa4.html

IT DOES NOT END THERE!!!!

There is now a call for any doctor who questions vaccines or speaks out to have their licence to practice medicine revoked. The media seems to be championing this agenda and both FORBES and CNN have stepped away from journalism to play judge, jury, and executioner.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterlipson/2015/01/30/anti-vaccine-doctors-should-lose-their-licenses/

CNN
has made Dr. Jack Wolfson a target after he spoke out on the MEASLES outbreak and not only said vaccines were bad but encouraged natural immunity.  The Arizona Medical Board has since opened a case against him. I am sure the media bias had nothing to do with this...

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/12-news/2015/01/23/12news-doctor-dont-vaccinate/22200535/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/05/health/anti-vaccine-doctor-jack-wolfson/

WHAT WOULD MOTIVATE THEM????


First off there are millions upon millions of parents who are questioning vaccines, it has become fashionable to disrespect those who question non vaxers and it is pretty much at the point that they are encouraging violence and harm towards us. I will be posting more about this in another post and hope I can stay on topic. The parents refusing to be vaccinated and to have their kids not be subjected to vaccines is a huge loss of revenue. VACCINE INJURIES ARE VERY REAL AND THEY KNOW IT!!!!!

There is also another thing that is fuelling the witch hunt towards vaccine refusers and anyone who questions vaccines and vaccine polocy. In 2010 virologists Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski accused the pharma giant in 2010 of faking the efficacy of its MMR vaccine. According to them Merck infused a blood sample with animal antibodies to make it look like the vaccine had elicited increased antibody production, the scientists claimed." This is a startling claim, and if true could cut into profit because in order for a vaccine to approved by the FDA it must show 95% effectiveness.

http://medcitynews.com/2015/02/natural-news-stirring-pot-merck-whistleblower-suit-falsified-mumps-rubella-measles-vaccine-data/

Adding to the motive to lie is the fact the CDC already had strong ties to MERCK and it is easy to believe that former head of the CDC Dr. Julie Gerberding already had her eye on a job with the pharmaceutical giant.
SO CHECK THIS OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!


http://www.naturalnews.com/048569_vaccine_fraud_Julie_Gerberding_cover-up.html

AND THE FOLLOWING!!!!!


MERCK back in December of 2014 named Dr. Julie Gerberding as Executive Vice President for Strategic Communications, Global Public Policy, and Population Health.
 

http://www.pharmacytimes.com/market-news/Merck-Announces-Appointment-of-Dr-Julie-Gerberding-as-Executive-Vice-President-for-Strategic-Communications-Global-Public-Policy-and-Population-Health

SO, THERE YOU HAVE IT FOLKS!!!!! THIS IS WHY THERE HAS BEEN SO MUCH FOCUS ON A NON EVENT SUCH AS MEASLES, IT WAS TO TURN US ALL AWAY FROM THE REAL STORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Wednesday, January 28, 2015

MEASLES IN THE HIGHLY POISONED!!!!!!!!

There are many LIARS and MISINFORMED people claiming that MEASLES only happens in the "NON VACCINATED"....

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/2013-measles-outbreak-failing-vaccine-not-failure-vaccinate1

Are the recently reported measles outbreaks in the U.S. being caused by the failure to vaccinate, or the failure of the vaccine? Shockingly, clinically confirmed reports of measles vaccine failure in fully vaccinated populations stretch back a quarter of a century from around the world.
In a recent CNN Health opinion piece too easily confused with reporting titled, US measles cases in 2013 may be the worst in 17 years, Elizabeth Cohen, CNN's Senior Medical Correspondent, blames the 159 cases of measles the CDC reported occurring from Jan. 1 through Aug. 24th on "visitors from countries where measles is common" and "vaccine objectors within the United States."
What makes her conspicuously non-referenced statistics so disturbing is that she is ignoring a substantial body of literature, including peer-reviewed and published epidemiological and clinical studies, indicating that the recent measles outbreaks are just as likely caused by the failure of the vaccine as by presumably irrational and/or irresponsible parents exercising their legal right and responsibility to choose whether or not to vaccine their children.
Let's fill in the data that so obviously got flushed down the memory hole by this irresponsible piece of CNN 'reporting.'
First, we should acknowledge one underreported fact of immunology: vaccine-induced antibody elevations do not guarantee real world protection against the pathogen the vaccine is intended to immunize us against, which is the only true measure of their value.
This is not a new observation. It goes back decades, with a 1990 study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases finding that even though 95% of a population of urban African children had measles antibodies after vaccination, vaccine efficacy was not more than 68%.[1]
Or, take a look at 2008 study that found that even when the measles vaccine successfully generates an elevation of measles specific antibodies 20.7% (6 out of 29) have non-protective titers.[2] Or, one from 1988 that found that within a highly vaccinated community experiencing an outbreak of measles, antibody responses to measles could be found in 100% of the unvaccinated versus only 89.2% of the vaccinated. They conclude: "[A] history of prior measles vaccination is not always associated with immunity nor with the presence of specific antibodies.[3]
Again, the point remains the same: vaccine-induced synthetic immunity does not guarantee real world protection, and certainly not with anything near 100% effectiveness, despite what the CDC, vaccine manufacturers or mainstream news reports imply by blaming the non-vaccinated for vaccine-failure associated outbreaks.
Read our report on the groundbreaking 2011 study published in the journal Immunity that challenges the primary antibody-based justification for vaccination if you need a more in-depth explanation of this critical point.
Second, there is plenty of research available today demonstrating that the adverse health effects associated with the measles vaccine, and particularly the trivalent mumps, measles, rubella combination vaccine,[4] may far outweigh their purported therapeutic effects, that even if a vaccine is successful at preventing and/or delaying infection from measles this does not mean that this will improve the overall health of those vaccinated. To the contrary, it has been known for several decades that the administration of measles vaccine in underdeveloped countries may actually be resulting in higher infant mortality rates.[5] [6] This has, in fact, been a persistent criticism levied against UNICEF's vaccine-heavy strategy in certain regions of Africa, which appear to have increased mortality rates.[7] UNICEF is not solely to blame, as there are quite a few 'charitable health organizations' patting each other on the back for 'saving lives' by reducing 'vaccine-preventable diseases,' at the very moment that mortality from vaccine-associated adverse effects are increasing. This is exactly what's so deranged about the Global Polio Eradication campaign, whose claim to have virtually eradicated wild-type polio in India obscures the fact that the live vaccine-specific strain of polio, believed to be twice as lethal as the natural form, may now be causing close to 48,000 cases of polio vaccine associated injury a year.

Measles Vaccine Failures Documented for A Quarter of A Century, Around the World

Now to the heart of the problem with CNN's article.  Throughout the real (not imaginary) history of the measles vaccine, failure after failure has been recorded, starting with:
  • 1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, "An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced." They concluded: "We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune."[8]
  • 1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, "A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures," an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: "This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy."[9]
  • 1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, "early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity ... due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: "...measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations."[10]
  • 1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was "largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage," but following an extensive review the researchers concluded "Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.[11]
  • 1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday. [12]
  • 1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, "[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised." Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.[13]These six outbreaks are by no means exhaustive of the biomedical literature, but illustrate just how mislead the general public is about the effectiveness of measles vaccines, and the CDC's immunization agenda in general.  No amount of ignoring history will erase the fact that vaccination does not equal immunization. The superstitious and ironically non-evidence-based faith in the infallibility of vaccines speaks volumes to why the growing movement to educate the public about the true nature of vaccines is increasingly labeled "anti-vaccine," when in fact it is pro-vaccine awareness. UNICEF and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation can continue to label those who bring the peer-reviewed 'evidence' to the public's attention as 'liars' or 'child killers, as Bill Gates said in a CNN interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta. But all this does is increase the public's suspicion of the real agenda behind their ostensibly charitable plea to save the poor and the needy from the hell of disease, instead of focusing on improving their most basic living conditions, nutrition, sanitation, etc., and making inroads to reduce the geopolitical violence that is ruining the lives of hundreds of millions. Measles is a real disease with real adverse health effects, some of which can be life threatening. But our immune status, as with all infectious diseases, determines susceptibility and whether or not a disease will be mild or lethal. You can't vaccinate away conditions that lead to compromised immunity, nor can you immunize folks against the desire to pursue the truth about vaccines. Learn more on our research vaccine database: Health Guide: Vaccine Research

    [1] P Aaby, K Knudsen, T G Jensen, J Thårup, A Poulsen, M Sodemann, M C da Silva, H Whittle. Measles incidence, vaccine efficacy, and mortality in two urban African areas with high vaccination coverage. J Infect Dis. 1990 Nov ;162(5):1043-8. PMID: 2230232
    [2] Inácio M Mandomando, Denise Naniche, Marcela F Pasetti, Xavier Vallès, Lilian Cuberos, Ariel Nhacolo, Karen L Kotloff, Helder Martins, Myron M Levine, Pedro Alonso. Measles-specific neutralizing antibodies in rural Mozambique: seroprevalence and presence in breast milk. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Nov;79(5):787-92. PMID: 18981523
    [3] L Sekla, W Stackiw, G Eibisch, I Johnson. An evaluation of measles serodiagnosis during an outbreak in a vaccinated community. Clin Invest Med. 1988 Aug ;11(4):304-9. PMID: 3168353
    [4] GreenMedInfo.com > Research > Problematic Actions > Vaccination: Measles-Mumps-Rubella: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-mumps-measles-rubella-mmr
    [5] A J Hall, F T Cutts. Lessons from measles vaccination in developing countries. BMJ. 1993 Nov 20;307(6915):1294-5. PMID: 8257878
    [6] Peter Aaby, Henrik Jensen, Francois Simondon, Hilton Whittle. High-titer measles vaccination before 9 months of age and increased female mortality: do we have an explanation? Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2003 Jul;14(3):220-32. PMID: 12913835
    [7] BBC New, Unicef child-death campaign in Africa 'failed,' Jan. 2010
    [8] T L Gustafson, A W Lievens, P A Brunell, R G Moellenberg, C M Buttery, L M Sehulster. Measles outbreak in a fully immunized secondary-school population. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 26 ;316(13):771-4. PMID: 3821823
    [9] R M Davis, E D Whitman, W A Orenstein, S R Preblud, L E Markowitz, A R Hinman. A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Sep ;126(3):438-49. PMID: 3618578
    [10] B S Hersh, L E Markowitz, R E Hoffman, D R Hoff, M J Doran, J C Fleishman, S R Preblud, W A Orenstein. A measles outbreak at a college with a prematriculation immunization requirement. Am J Public Health. 1991 Mar ;81(3):360-4. PMID: 1994745
    [11] N Boulianne, G De Serres, B Duval, J R Joly, F Meyer, P Déry, M Alary, D Le Hénaff, N Thériault.[Major measles epidemic in the region of Quebec despite a 99% vaccine coverage]. Can J Public Health. 1991 May-Jun;82(3):189-90. PMID: 1884314
    [12] S A de Oliveira, W N Soares, M O Dalston, M T de Almeida, A J Costa. Clinical and epidemiological findings during a measles outbreak occurring in a population with a high vaccination coverage. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995 Oct-Dec;28(4):339-43. PMID: 8668833
    [13] N Coetzee, G D Hussey, G Visser, P Barron, A Keen. The 1992 measles epidemic in Cape Town--a changing epidemiological pattern. S Afr Med J. 1994 Mar ;84(3):145-9. PMID: 7740350


USA TODAY: “Jail ‘anti-vax’ parents”

SO, THIS IS WHAT PASSES FOR NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/27/jail-anti-vax-parents-vaccines-cdc-measles-disney-world-california-column/22420771/
The entirely preventable California measles outbreak has now sickened more than 70 people. With perhaps hundreds more exposed, the outbreak will likely continue.
As the disease spreads, experts will debate how we respond and what to do about the anti-vaccine movement that’s partly to blame for this mess. Likely, all we’ll agree on is better outreach to parents.
That’s not enough. Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail.
In the year 2015, it is amazing that anyone in the United States contracts measles. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that the U.S. eliminated all native cases of measles in the year 2000. New cases generally occurred only among unvaccinated foreigners. Today, however, because of ignorant “anti-vaxxers,” the disease is staging a comeback.
Anti-vaxxers often claim the right not to put “poison” in their children’s bodies. That is ludicrous. A mountain of data has demonstrated that vaccines are safe and effective. Insisting otherwise is akin to believing that the moon landing was faked.
Like this column? Get more in your e-mail inbox
A more serious objection is that, like birth control, those with religious objections should be exempted. But, let’s remember that civil rights go both ways.
Prohibitionist John Finch once said, “Your right to swing your arm leaves off where my right not to have my nose struck begins.” For infectious disease, we could reformulate that to: “Your right to be sick ends where my right to be healthy begins.”
Measles is perhaps the most infectious human disease. Virus particles can remain in the air for up to two hours after an infected person leaves. And measles is not a minor infection. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that before widespread vaccination began in 1980, 2.6 million people a year died from measles. About 400 people a day still do.
Put simply, no person has the right to threaten the safety of his community. Like drunken drivers, the unvaccinated pose an imminent danger to others. They pose a lethal threat to the most vulnerable: the immunocompromised, such as HIV or cancer patients, and infants who have yet to receive their vaccines.
Anti-vaccine parents are turning their children into little walking time bombs. They ought to be charged for endangering their children and others.
Because humans are the only natural host for the virus, the WHO hopes to eradicate the disease from the planet, just like smallpox. This noble mission has been greatly complicated by such medical luminaries as Bill Maher and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who have spread anti-vaccine propaganda to millions. They have blood on their hands.
It is time to end this insanity. Though jail sounds drastic, it could be the only way to send a strong message about the deadly consequences of failing to vaccinate children.

So FORBES wants to see non vaxers sued for measles outbreak...

I ALMOST HAVE NO WORDS FOR HOW STUPID THIS IS, BUT I AM GONNA TRY! This excuse for news is filled with every lie I can think of ranging from claims of lack of access to vaccines all the way to the half truth of  Newborn children are too young to be vaccinated--This part is true, BUT it is ONLY true because of the measles vaccine. Mothers who have had natural measles pass on immunity that last the first two to three years of life. DAN DIAMOND goes on to bad mouth non vaxing parents and paint the children as victims. He then starts in with the garbage about how non vaxers should be sued and has the nerve to compare it with drunk driving UGH!

http://www.forbes.com/sites/dandiamond/2015/01/28/measles-is-spreading-and-kids-might-die-sue-parents-who-didnt-vaccinate-absolutely/

To Protect His Son, A Father Asks School To Bar Unvaccinated Children

I AM VERY SORRY THIS KID HAS CANCER, I AM SORRY WE LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE EVEN THE FOOD SUPPLY IS TOXIC, BUT I FEEL IF THIS IS KID IS THIS SICK HE SHOULD BE THE ONE REMOVED FROM SCHOOL! All of this fear over what used to be not a big deal, a week or so with spots and you were done with it...

www.npr.org/blogs/health/2015/01/27/381888697/to-protect-his-son-a-father-asks-school-to-bar-unvaccinated-childrena

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Early Life Infections Improve the Function of the Immune System

http://www.chiro.org/Immunity/

Early Life Infections Improve the Function of the Immune System
by Daniel J. Murphy, DC, FACO
Vice President of the ICA


A 1998 article published in the journal THORAX titled:
Early Childhood Infection and Atopic Disorder [ 1 ] notes:

1) Atopic diseases (asthma, hay fever, and eczema in this study) are rapidly rising in westernized communities.

2) The mechanism for this increase in atopic diseases is reduced exposure to microbes.

3) Atopic diseases were significantly statistically linked to immunization with the Pertussis vaccine and to treatment with oral antibiotics in the first two years of life.

4) The authors conclude that exposure to certain infections repress atopic disorders.


A 1999 article published in the journal THE LANCET titled Atopy in Children of Families with an Anthroposophic Lifestyle notes [ 2 ]

1) The increased prevalence of atopic disorders in children may be associated with changes in childhood infections as related to vaccination programs and antibiotics that alter intestinal microflora.

2) Children who use antibiotics restrictively and have few vaccinations have lower levels of atopic diseases.


Another 1999 article published in the journal CLINICAL EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY titled Antibiotic use in early childhood and the development of asthma notes [ 3 ]

1) Antibiotic use is significantly associated with a history of asthma.

2) If antibiotics are used in the first year of life there is a 305 percent increased risk of developing asthma when compared with children who had never used antibiotics.

3) If antibiotics are used only after the first year of life there is a 64 percent increased risk of asthma when compared with children who had never used antibiotics.

4) The greater the number of courses of antibiotics given to children, the greater the risk that they will develop asthma.

5) “Early childhood infection may have a protective role against the subsequent development of asthma.”

6) The treatment of infant infections with antibiotics could play a role in the development of childhood asthma.

7) Antibiotics increase the risk of asthma by “reducing the intensity and duration of acquired bacterial infections.”

8) There is a “temporal association between the increasing prevalence of asthma and the increasing use of antibiotics throughout the developed world.”


A 2000 article published in the journal ALLERGY titled The immunology of fetuses and infants: What drives the allergic march? notes [ 4 ]

1) Atopy refers to allergic conditions which include hay fever, asthma, and eczema, and are associated with the production of IgE antibodies to common environmental allergens.

2) The risk of atopic disease early in life is particularly high in Western industrialized countries.

3) The critical period that influences the development of atopy is the first years of life.

4) “A decline in certain childhood infections or a lack of exposure to infectious agents during the first years of life could have caused the recent epidemic of atopic disease and asthma.”

5) Recovery from natural measles infection reduces the incidence of atopy and allergic responses to house-dust mites to half that seen in vaccinated children.

6) Bacterial infections are modulators of the atopic march.

7) The use of antibiotics during the first two years of life increases the risk of asthma.


Another 2000 article published in the journal THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE titled Siblings, Day-Care Attendance, and the Risk of Asthma and Wheezing during Childhood notes [ 5 ]

1) Young children with older siblings and those who attend day care are at increased risk for infections, which in turn may protect against the development of allergic diseases, including asthma.

2) Exposure of young children to older children at home or to other children at day care protects against the development of asthma and frequent wheezing later in childhood.

3) The incidence and the prevalence of asthma among children have increased dramatically in the past three decades, making it the most common chronic disease of childhood in the United States, and a decrease in infections during early childhood may be responsible.

4) “The incidence of asthma among children who had two or more older siblings or who attended day care during the first six months of life was significantly lower than that among children who had one sibling or no siblings and who did not attend day care.”

5) Bacterial or viral infections occurring during infancy may provide important signals to the newborn’s maturing immune system.


This article generated an editorial titled Day Care, Siblings, and Asthma — Please, Sneeze on My Child , that included the following comments: [ 6 ]

1) “Parents generally agree that children who attend day care or who have older siblings have more frequent infections. They may be surprised to learn, however, that this tendency may protect their younger children from asthma.”

2) “A common factor underlying the increased prevalence of asthma and atopic disease may be a reduction in early exposure to microbes, with a lasting influence on immune development.”

3) An important signal for normal postnatal immune system maturation is exposure to microbes. Deprivation of these signals in infants may allow a change that increases the risk of eventual asthma and atopic disease.


A 2001 article published in the journal ALLERGY titled The causes of the increasing prevalence of allergy: Is atopy a microbial deprivation disorder? [ 7 ]

1) “The atopic diseases, i.e., primarily, bronchial asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, were rare a few decades ago, but constitute today an increasingly severe public health problem.”

2) “The increase in the prevalence of the allergic diseases, especially in those born after 1960, is almost explosive, and there are now epidemics of allergic diseases in many countries.”

3) “The prevalence of asthma in children and young adults has tripled and quadrupled in many industrialized countries during the last two decades.”

4) Allergic sensitization may occur in utero. [Important, as noted below.]

5) Allergic sensitization that occurs early in childhood tends to persist throughout life.

6) The very first months of life are of crucial importance in allergy development.

7) “The more children in the family, the more infections they encounter” and this may help to prevent allergy.

8) Viral infections protect against allergic disease.

9) “If the assumption that early viral or bacterial infections protect against the development of allergic diseases is correct, vaccination should lead to an increase of allergic disorders.”

10) Atopy is correlated to MMR vaccination (measles, mumps, rubella) and with the administration of antibiotics.

11) There is a significant relationship between treatment with antibiotics during the first two years of life and later development of allergy.

12) “Multiple courses of antibiotic treatment are associated with higher allergy prevalence, and the finding that treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics appears to be more likely associated with allergy development than is ordinary penicillin.”

13) “Microbial agents do indeed play a protective role in the development of allergic disease.”

14) Childhood infections lower allergy prevalence, especially bacterial infections.

15) “From an evolutionary perspective [INNATE], it is perhaps not unexpected that the immune system, which over millions of years has adapted to a heavy microbial load, may react in an ‘inadequate’ way upon a sudden, radical decrease of this load, caused by vaccinations, antibiotics, and especially improved hygienic conditions.”

16) “A change in the ‘microbial load’ seems to be the most probable cause of the increase in the allergic diseases.”


A 2002 article published in the journal ALLERGY titled The rise of atopy and links to infection notes [ 8 ]

1) This article explores the evidence that “exposure to certain antibiotics and public health immunizations in early life” are the cause of atopic disorders.

2) This article also explores the evidence that “certain microbial exposures [infections] can inhibit experimental allergy.”

3) “Certain natural infections promote immune regulatory processes that can restrain atopy.”

4) 45 percent of children in some countries may be suffering from atopic disorders.

5) “Antibiotic receipt in early life is associated with more subsequent atopy and asthma.”

6) Antibiotics given early life (<24 months of age) for any clinical indication “predicted substantially more subsequent atopic disorder.”

7) 80 percent of children who subsequently display atopic disorder received antibiotics at two months.

8) There is a “direct promotion of atopy by antibiotic receipt.”

9) Certain immunizations may also increase subsequent atopy, including pertussis in the DPT vaccine and the measles/mumps/rubella (MMR) vaccine.

10) The limited microbial exposure caused by hygiene, antibiotics, and vaccinations may also explain the rising of inflammatory disorders, such as insulin dependent diabetes, in developed countries.

11) Microbial exposure “may play a key role in allowing the immune system to develop protective responses.”


Another 2002 article published in the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE titled Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children notes [ 9 ]

1) “Asthma is the most common chronic disease in childhood and accounts for substantial morbidity and health care costs.”

2) One can have exposure to microbes or to nonviable parts of microbes and not become infected.

3) “Environmental exposure to microbial products may have a crucial role during the maturation of a child ‘s immune response.”

4) Exposure to microbial products is “associated with a significant decrease in the risk of hay-fever, atopic sensitization, atopic asthma, and atopic wheeze in childhood.”

5) “The innate immune system responds [favorably, for ones entire life] to a high microbial burden.”

6) Exposure to microbial products strongly affects the development of atopy and childhood asthma.


This article generated an editorial titled Eat Dirt—The Hygiene Hypothesis and Allergic Diseases , that included the following comments: [ 10 ]

1) There is an epidemic of both autoimmune diseases and allergic diseases.

2) “One theory proposed to explain this increase in the prevalence of autoimmune and allergic diseases is that it results from a decrease in the prevalence of childhood infection.”


Another 2002 article published in the same issue of the NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE titled Mechanisms of Disease: The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases notes [ 11 ]

1) Infectious agents can suppress allergic (asthma, rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis) and autoimmune (multiple sclerosis, insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes, and Crohn’s disease) disorders.

2) The incidence of these disorders began to increase in the 1950s [coincidentally with the availability of antibiotics and vaccinations] and continues today.

3) There has been a significant decrease in the incidence of many infectious diseases in developed countries as a result of antibiotics, vaccination, and improved hygiene.

4) Early childhood infections change immune system maturation.

5) The administration of antibiotics to children increases the risk of asthma and allergy.

6) Decreased exposure of women to viruses before pregnancy may subsequently reduce the degree of protection against these viruses afforded to their newborns.

7) “Vaccination strategies should be examined in the context of the hygiene hypothesis.”

8) Vaccinations may prevent ‘protective’ infections and thus have an unfavorable effect.

9) “In addition to the problem of antibiotic resistance, unnecessary treatment with antibiotics could reduce the degree of physiological immunostimulation afforded by commensal bacteria.”

10) “There is a certain irony in the fact that we must now search for new ways to reproduce the infectious diseases against which we have been fighting with great success over the past three decades.”

11) These mechanisms might extend to other immune disorders, like non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [cancer], which is also increasing in developed countries.


Another 2002 article published in the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE titled The Importance of Prenatal Exposures on the Development of Allergic Disease notes [ 12 ]

1) A decreased exposure to infection may play an important role in the etiology of allergic disease, but there is little data on the impact of change in microbial exposure during pregnancy on the child’s risk of developing allergic disease.

2) Exposure to antibiotics in utero is associated with an increased risk of asthma, eczema and hay fever in a dose-related manner.

3) Exposure to antibiotics in utero is a important risk factor in the development of allergic disease.

4) Because the immune system develops in utero, exposure to antibiotics during pregnancy is associated with an increased incidence of allergic diseases.

5) “This effect did not appear to depend on the type of antibiotic prescribed or the trimester the antibiotics were prescribed.”


A 2005 article published in the BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL titled Day care in infancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia notes [ 13 ]

1) Reduced exposure to infection in the first few months of life increases the risk of developing acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

2) Several other investigators have reported reduced risks of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children with many infections.

3) Reduced infections in the first year of life provides “inadequate priming of the naïve immune system” and “may precipitate a highly dysregulated immune response.”

4) “Similar associations have been reported for type 1 diabetes and allergies in children.”

5) “Some degree of early exposure to infection seems to be important for child health.”



PUBLISHED RESPONSES THAT FOLLOWED THIS ARTICLE INCLUDE:

“Striking the right balance between protecting our children from damaging or life threatening infections whilst exposing them to a ‘sufficient dose’ of milder infections to prime their immune systems, has far-reaching social and behavioural connotations.”

— Roger C Parslow, Senior Research Fellow, Paediatric Epidemiology Group, University of Leeds


[This was my favorite response, by a chiropractor, Dr. Richard Lanigan]

“Gilham et al’s findings should not come as a surprise, however they have stopped short of questioning the possible benefits to the immune system of what were once called ‘normal childhood infections’ and now, are extremely rare.”

“Prevention of infectious diseases is seen universally as beneficial to the health of society. However few have considered the possibility that natural selection and these diseases, played a role in the development of the immune system to fight more deadly diseases.”

Dr. Lanigan then cites references to support the following points:

1) Children who take fewer antibiotics and a lower rate of immunization also have a lower prevalence of asthma, eczema and hay fever than the controls.

2) Children who contract measles are less likely to develop asthma, a disease that was rare thirty years ago and now kills 2000 people per year in the UK.

3) DPT vaccination increases the risk of allergy.

4) There is a specific inverse relationship between contracting measles and atopic diseases.

5) Children who did not have the DPT or polio immunization did not suffer from asthma or other allergic illnesses while 23 - 30 percent of the control group did.

6) Children who suffered infections in the first year of life are less likely to develop insulin dependent diabetes.

7) Immunized children have twice the incidence of type-1 diabetes.

—Richard Lanigan, Chiropractor


“The study by Gilham et al. confirms the hypothesis that reduced exposure to infection early in life has effects on the maturing immune system that increase the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and possibly other malignancies.”

“The immunological basis of this increased risk is uncertain but it could be the result of the inadequate development of immune surveillance mechanisms that detect cancer-specific antigenic determinants.”

“Gilham et al. postulate that the inadequate priming of the immune system due to a lack of exposure to infection permits subsequent infections by unknown exogenous agents, probably viruses, to cause immune dysregulation leading to acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.”

— John M.Grange
Centre for Infectious Diseases
and International Health,
University College London.

— Bernd Krone
Klaus F. Kölmel
Departments of Virology and Dermatology, University of Göttingen, Germany


“Before 1920, acute leukemia among children was a rare event. A significant peak-age incidence (2-5 years) appeared after 1940. Since then, the incidence rate of childhood leukemia has been more or less remarkably stable. This means that some leukemogenic factor must have been introduced in children’s lives some time around 1940.”

“It is a highly striking coincidence that at the same year the introduction of immunization against diphtheria was began on a national scale.”

— Petar I. Ivanovski, pediatrician
University Childrens Hospital, Belgrade


“I wonder if our friends at the CDC, NIH, WHO etc. have considered adding leukemia in addition to diabetes, Guillian-Barre’, Autism, SIDS, Arthritis, Thrombocytopenia, Encephalitis, Death, SBS, Distressed Breathing, Thimerosal Accumulation in Brain (TAB), delayed speech, tics, seizures, hallucinations, dizziness, Hemorrhagic Vasculomyelinopathy etc. etc. etc. to ‘highly coincidental’ adverse reactions from the long list of mass immunizations.”

“Do you think parents would be informed during their child’s well visit of any of the above?”

“In particular, MMR advice from WHO is to jab unless the child is in serious risk of dying. And the only reason given not to jab in this instance is that the death may “incorrectly” be attributed to the MMR. And we wonder why most all serious adverse vaccine reactions are attributed to ‘coincidence’. As clearly seen in this WHO advice—take great lengths to disclaim any adverse vaccine reaction.”

— L. Travis Haws, Dentist
Lakewood CO 80228


“I draw attention to a letter entitled ‘Immunization and Childhood Leukaemia’ in which it was shown that Leukaemia in children in Brisbane Children’s Hospital from 1958 to 1964 showed a significant statistical association with immunization against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough.”

In view of Dr Ivanovski’s observations that the incidence of childhood leukaemia increased with the introduction of DPT vaccination it is virtually certain that, if investigated, they will find the group with Leukaemia also shows a statistically significant increase in immunization with DPT vaccine.

— Michael Innis, Director Medisets International


KEY POINTS FROM THIS ARTICLE INCLUDE:

1) A number of studies going back nearly two decades propose that a deficit of exposure to infectious agents in infancy delays immune system development and is consequently responsible for the childhood peak of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia at age 2-5 years.

2) Sending infants to day care increases the incidences of infections, which plays an important role in immune system development, and reduces the incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

3) In this study, infants in day care without older siblings had a 39 percent reduction in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

4) Infants in day care with older siblings had a 62 percent reduction in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

5) “The greatest reduction in risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was seen in children who attended formal day care during the first three months of life.” [Very Important: this indicates that the first 3 months of life are a critical time for infants to actually get infections so that their immune system develops appropriately and strongly, which reduces the incidences of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and other diseases]

6) Not being infected (“immunological isolation”) in infancy increases the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

7) Nine other case-control studies of childhood leukaemia suggest a reduction in risk of around 30-40 percent for day care attendance and increased infections.

8) Not being infected (“immunological isolation”) in the first year of life provides “inadequate priming of the naïve immune system” and “may precipitate a highly dysregulated immune response.”

9) Increased infections in the first few months of life reduce chances of developing acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

10) “The most plausible interpretation is that this protection comes from exposure to common infections.” [This means that exposure to common infections is a good thing in terms of immune system development and reduced incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.]

11) Exposure to common childhood infections also reduces incidence of type-1 diabetes and allergies.

12) “Some degree of early exposure to infection seems to be important for child health.” [Very Important]


KEY POINTS IN THE RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE INCLUDE:

1) The prevention of infectious diseases [with antibiotics and vaccinations] impairs the development of the immune system so that it is less capable of fighting more deadly diseases, including cancer.

2) Antibiotics and vaccination of children (especially DPT) increase asthma, eczema, hay fever, allergies, atopic disorders, insulin dependent diabetes.

3) Immunized children have twice the incidence of type-1 diabetes.

4) Mass immunizations have been linked to leukemia, diabetes, Guillian-Barre’, Autism, SIDS, Arthritis, Thrombocytopenia, Encephalitis, Death, SBS, Distressed Breathing, Thimerosal Accumulation in Brain, delayed speech, tics, seizures, hallucinations, dizziness, Hemorrhagic Vasculomyelinopathy etc. etc. etc.

5) There is a significant statistical association with immunization against diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.


SUMMARY POINTS FROM DAN MURPHY, D.C.

These articles, published in the world’s finest medical journals by many individuals from multiple continents, have several common points of agreement:

1) A person’s immune system begins to develop and mature in utero.

2) The first years, and especially the first few months, of a persons life are also critical times in the lifelong development and maturation of the immune system.

3) The most important factor directing the proper development and maturation of the immune system so that it will best serve a person for life is exposure to bacteria and actually being infected with a variety of bacteria and viruses.

4) Antibiotics, beginning in utero, and certain vaccinations against common childhood diseases received in the first few years of life deprive the developing and maturing immune system of the stimulus required for optimal lifelong function.

5) The consequences of the microbial depravation are increased incidences of allergies, hay fever, eczema, asthma, multiple sclerosis, type-I diabetes, and leukemia.


Dan Murphy graduated magna cum laude from Western States Chiropractic College in 1978, and has more than 20 years of practice experience. He received Diplomat status in Chiropractic Orthopedics in 1986. Since 1982, Dr. Murphy has served part-time as undergraduate faculty at Life Chiropractic College West, currently teaching classes to seniors in the management of spinal disorders.

Dr. Murphy is on the post-graduate faculty of several chiropractic colleges. His post-graduate continuing education classes include “Whiplash and Spinal Trauma” and “Pain Neurology.” Dr. Murphy is the coordinator of a year-long certification program in “Chiropractic Spinal Trauma,” now (2000) in its twelfth year of being offered. This year, the program is being offered through the International Chiropractors Association of California. He has taught more than 700 post-graduate continuing education seminars.

Dr. Murphy is a contributing author to the book Motor Vehicle Collision Injuries, published by Aspen, 1996; and to the book Pediatric Chiropractic, published by Williams & Wilkins, 1998. He writes a quarterly column in the Journal of Clinical Chiropractic.

In 1987, 1991 and 1995 Dr. Murphy received the Post-graduate Educator of the Year award, given by the International Chiropractic Association. In 1997, he received The Carl S. Cleveland, Jr., Educator of the Year award, given by the International Chiropractic Association of California.


REFERENCES:

1) Farooqi IS, Hopkin JM
Early Childhood Infection and Atopic Disorder
Thorax, 1998;53:927-932

2) Alm JS, Swartz J, Lilja G, Scheynius A, Pershagen G
Atopy in Children of Families with an Anthroposophic Lifestyle
The Lancet, Vol. 353, May 1, 1999, 1485-88

3) Wickens K, Pearce N, Crane J, Beasley R
Antibiotic use in early childhood and the development of asthma
Clin Exp Allergy 1999 Jun;29(6):766-71

4) Wahn U
The immunology of fetuses and infants: What drives the allergic march?
Allergy 55 (7), 591-599 (2000)

5) Ball TM, Castro-Rodriguez JA, Griffith KA, Holberg CJ, Martinez FD, Wright AL
Siblings, Day-Care Attendance, and the Risk of Asthma and Wheezing during Childhood
New England Journal of Medicine, Aug. 24, 2000, Vol. 343, No. 8, 538-43.

6) Christiansen SC
Day Care, Siblings, and Asthma — Please, Sneeze on My Child
The New England Journal of Medicine, August 24, 2000, Vol. 343, No. 8.

7) Strannegard O, Strannegard I-L
The causes of the increasing prevalence of allergy: is atopy a microbial deprivation disorder?
” Allergy 56 (2), 2001, 91-102.

8) Hopkin JM
The rise of atopy and links to infection
Allergy, Volume 57, August 2002, Issue s72.

9) Braun-Fahrlander C, Riedler J, Herz U, Eder W, Waser M, Grize L, Maisch S, Carr D, Gerlach F, Bufe A, Lauener RP, Schierl R, Renz H, Nowak D, Von Mutius E
Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children
The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol.347, No.12, September 19, 2002, 869-877

10) Weiss S
Eat Dirt—The Hygiene Hypothesis and Allergic Diseases
New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 347, No. 12, September 19, 2002, 930-931.

11) Bach JF
Mechanisms of Disease: The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases
New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 347, No. 12, September 19, 2002, 911-920

12) McKeever TM, Lewis SA, Smith C, Hubbard R
The importance of prenatal exposures on the development of allergic disease: a birth cohort study using the West Midlands General Practice Database
American Journal Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine Vol. 166, pp. 827-832, 2002.

13) Gilham C, Peto J, Simpson J, Roman E, Eden TOB, Greaves MF, Alexander FE
Day care in infancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: findings from UK case-control study
British Medical Journal, June 4, 2005.